Comparing the value of perceived human versus AI-generated empathy

Author: Rubin, Matan; Li, Joanna Z.; Zimmerman, Federico; Ong, Desmond C.; Goldenberg, Amit; Perry, Anat

Description: Artificial intelligence (AI) and specifically large language models demonstrate remarkable social-emotional abilities, which may improve human-AI interactions and AI’s emotional support capabilities. However, it remains unclear whether empathy, encompassing understanding, ‘feeling with’ and caring, is perceived differently when attributed to AI versus humans. We conducted nine studies (n = 6,282) where AI-generated empathic responses to participants’ emotional situations were labelled as provided by either humans or AI. Human-attributed responses were rated as more empathic and supportive, and elicited more positive and fewer negative emotions, than AI-attributed ones. Moreover, participants’ own uninstructed belief that AI had aided the human-attributed responses reduced perceived empathy and support. These effects were replicated across varying response lengths, delays, iterations and large language models and were primarily driven by responses emphasizing emotional sharing and care. Additionally, people consistently chose human interaction over AI when seeking emotional engagement. These findings advance our general understanding of empathy, and specifically human-AI empathic interactions.

Subject headings: Humans; Empathy; Artificial Intelligence; Female; Male; Adult; Emotions; Young Adult; AI

Publication year: 2025

Journal or book title: Nature Human Behaviour

Volume: 9

Issue: 11

Pages: 2345-2359

Find the full text: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-025-02247-w

Find more like this one (cited by): https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=10312923674184433905&as_sdt=1000005&sciodt=0,16&hl=en

Serial number: 4140

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.