Author: Braine, M.D.S.; O’Brien, D.P.; Noveck, I.A.; Samuels, M.C.; Lea, R.B.; Fisch, S.M.; Yang, Y.
Description: This article examines whether a particular mental logic introduced by M. D. S. Braine, B. J. Reiser, and B. Rumain (1984) is a reasonably accurate model of people’s logical routines for propositional reasoning. Participants are presented with reasoning problems; to make their reasoning steps explicit, they write down, in order, everything they infer. The inferences predicted by the model are compared with participants’ output. Three quarters of participants’ responses were predicted, and 85%–90% of the time the output of the model’s core inference rules was written down. To predict equally well, L. J. Rips’s (1994) mental logic model would need to adopt some of our model’s features. The data indicate several problems in the mental models theory and cannot be explained by pragmatic reasoning schemas. Arguments against a mental logic are questioned. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)
Subject headings: Mental logic; Logical routines
Publication year: 1995
Journal or book title: Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
Volume: 124
Issue: 3
Pages: 263-292
Find the full text : https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037/0096-3445.124.3.263
Find more like this one (cited by): https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=4310003839509110318&as_sdt=1000005&sciodt=0,16&hl=en
Type: Journal Article
Serial number: 1977