Author: O’Brien, D.P.; Braine, M.D.S.; Yang, Y.
Description: Two experiments compared the predictions of mental-models theory with a mental-logic theory. A total of 120 undergraduates participated. Results show that people do not make fallacious inferences predicted by mental-models theory but not predicted by mental-logic theory, and that people routinely make many valid inferences predicted by mental-logic theory that should be too difficult on mental-models theory. Thus, the mental-logic theory accounts better for the data. A difference between the 2 theories concerning predictions about the order in which inferences are made was also investigated. The data clearly favor the mental-logic theory. It is argued that the mental-logic theory provides the more plausible description of the actual psychological processes in propositional reasoning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)
Subject headings: Mental models; Mental-logic theory
Publication year: 1994
Journal or book title: Psychological Review
Volume: 101
Issue: 4
Pages: 711-724
Find the full text :Â https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1995-08272-001
Find more like this one (cited by): https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=5799623689030975378&as_sdt=1000005&sciodt=0,16&hl=en
Type: Journal Article
Serial number: 1978